Competitive debate formats analysed in light of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation’s rules

Abstract

This study analyses the value of some of the most commonly used competitive debate formats around the globe. In particular, they are analysed in light of the rules of the ideal model of a critical discussion developed by the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. It is observed that, in many respects, these formats differ from the pragma-dialectical norms. While this may hinder their usefulness for being conducive to the resolution of a difference of opinion in an intersubjectively acceptable way for the participants, these formats may be useful to promote other valuable purposes.